There has been a lot of discussion in Australia about Senator Pauline Hanson’s burqa stunt. Many of those who have criticised her actions have argued that the act in itself presents a threat to national security – in part, because of the potential to offend the sensibilities of Muslims.
Green’s Senator Sarah Hanson Young, on a popular morning breakfast program, stated that Senator Pauline Hanson needs to reflect on the fact ‘security experts’ believe her actions could promote extremism (which experts by the way?).
“You are doing ISIS’s work for them,” Senator Hanson-Young told the Seven Network on Monday.
“You are putting the entire country at risk.”
Senator George Brandis similarly said Australia’s half-million Muslims – the “vast majority of [whom] are good, law-abiding Australians” – are vital to intelligence and law enforcement agencies.
These arguments reflect common misconceptions about terrorism and radicalisation in the West.
As Morsi, Muslim writer an academic stated (in a Facebook post),” It’s an argument often used to conceal that terrorism has more to do with wars.”
The Brandis and Hanson-Young arguments reduce the ‘Muslim community’ to national security allies.
Why is that we ask Muslims to participate in whole of community counter terrorism work, when within other crime types, the religious and ethnic backgrounds of those engaging in criminality are largely ignored, let alone discussed in such political and public forums?
Omar Sakr’s tweet sums up the issue well:
“So glad we ordinary Muslims are valued, in the absence of default humanity, as intelligence officers, otherwise pretty sure we’d be screwed.”
There needs to be a ‘radical’ shift in the way Western liberal democracies conceptualise Muslim communities in relation to counter terrorism and national security.
One the biggest failings of the Australian Government’s ‘muslim engagement’ schemes is association of whole ‘Muslim communities’ with national security.
Australian Senators should know better, with their knowledge of national security issues and high level of education, than to continually associate the Muslim community with national security in public platforms.